If you've ever wondered why, after too long in the bath, your fingers
and toes get wrinkly, our friends in the white coats have come up with
an explanation. Stories like this (and they come up often enough, heaven
knows) begin from the assumption that whatever is, is - or has been at
some past time - evolutionarily adaptive. The scientist's job, then, is
simply to construct a plausible narrative that 'explains' how evolution
brought it about. Isn't this all rather circular?
This story, on the other hand, doesn't invoke evolution, even though it
plausibly could - surely human life was for the most part interminably
boring until, in very recent times, we developed the means to distract
ourselves around the clock. Maybe sheer tedium was the engine of human evolution? I remember my own childhood as a landscape
containing great stagnant lagoons of boredom, and I think being bored for
much of the time probably did me more good than harm, making me develop
my 'inner resources'. We probably could all do with more empty space in
our mental lives - but I hope employers don't take this story seriously
and start inflicting more workplace tedium on us in the hope of reaping
creative rewards. It certainly wouldn't work in my case - when I'm
staring into the middle distance, the last thing I'm thinking about it
work.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment