Tuesday, 26 November 2024

'His books were read but ridiculed'

 I watched another episode of The Sea of Faith last night – number four (not yet on the BBC iPlayer but available, with blurry visuals, on YouTube). This one focused on two very different thinkers – Marx and Kierkegaard: 'compare and contrast' indeed. As with Freud, I wondered if Marx would be quite so prominent if the series were made today: back in 1984 I guess it was still possible to think that societies built on Marxist foundations might thrive – no longer, obviously. The half of the programme devoted to Kierkegaard was very much more rewarding, and Cupitt expounded the great Dane's ideas on Christianity quite lucidly, helped by an actor (Colin Jeavons) doing a good job of impersonating Kierkegaard. 
  Cupitt, I noticed, chose to pronounce 'Kierkegaard' with a silent 'd'. This triggered memories of Malcolm Muggeridge (last glimpsed here suggesting an 'orgy' to Kingsley Amis) screwing up his features hideously as he wrestled with the name, finally bringing out, in a long agonised drawl, something like 'Kierke-yaaaaaaaawd'. Whatever the challenges posed by his name, Kierkegaard was something of a hero to the late period, spiritual Muggeridge, who wrote this about him:  
'Against the new leviathan, whether in the guise of universal suffrage, democracy, or of an equally fraudulent triumphant proletariat, he pitted the individual human soul made in the image of a God who was concerned about the fate of every living creature. In contrast with the notion of salvation through power, he held out the hope of salvation through suffering. The Cross against the ballot box or clenched fist; the solitary pilgrim against the slogan-shouting mob; the crucified Christ against the demagogue-dictators promising a kingdom of heaven on earth, whether achieved through endlessly expanding wealth and material well-being, or through the ever greater concentration of power and its ever more ruthless exercise.'
  For a useful summing-up, elegantly expressed, we could turn to the American poet Dana Gioia. Here is his 'Homage to Soren Kierkegaard '–

Work out your own salvation
with fear and trembling.
                            —St Paul


I was already an old man when I was born.
Small with a curved back, he dragged his leg when walking
the streets of Copenhagen. 'Little Kierkegaard,'
they called him. Some meant it kindly. The more one suffers
the more one acquires a sense of the comic.
His hair rose in waves six inches above his head.
Save me, O God, from ever becoming sure.
What good is faith if it is not irrational?
 
Christianity requires a conviction of sin.
As a boy tending sheep on the frozen heath,
his starving father cursed God for his cruelty.
His fortunes changed. He grew rich and married well.
His father knew these blessings were God's punishment.
All would be stripped away. His beautiful wife died,
then five of his children. Crippled Soren survived.
The self-consuming sickness unto death is despair.
 
What the age needs is not a genius but a martyr.
Soren fell in love, proposed, then broke the engagement.
No one, he thought, could bear his presence daily.
My sorrow is my castle. His books were read
but ridiculed. Cartoons mocked his deformities,
His private journals fill seven thousand pages.
You could read them all, he claimed, and still not know him.
He who explains this riddle explains my life.
 
When everyone is Christian, Christianity
does not exist. The crowd is untruth. Remember
we stand alone before God in fear and trembling.
At forty-two he collapsed on his daily walk.
Dying he seemed radiant. His skin had become
almost transparent. He refused communion
from the established church. His grave has no headstone.
Now with God's help I shall at last become myself.

Monday, 25 November 2024

Kempff Again

 The first time I put up a Wilhelm Kempff post – this one – it attracted more readers than anything in years. So, as it's Kempff's birthday today (born 1895), I'm putting up an other beautiful specimen of his playing – his own transcription of the Siciliano from Bach's Flute Sonata, BWV1031:


Kempff wrote a number of Bach transcriptions, one of which features on Vikingur Olafsson'sgreat Bach album. It's a transcription of the Chorale Prelude 'Nun freut euch, lieben Christen g'mein', and it's a pretty astonishing performance. Indeed, Olafsson was even accused of overdubbing the chorale theme – which he somehow manages to play with his thumb, all his fingers being, er, otherwise engaged...

Saturday, 23 November 2024

The Sea of Faith

 BBC4 – which, for much of the time, is the only BBC channel worth watching – no longer has a budget for making new programmes. This apparent deprivation has also been something of a blessing, leaving the channel free to delve in the vast BBC archive of classic (or at least worth another look) programmes from happier times. Lately we've had the brilliant prison sitcom Porridge (razor-sharp scripts, perfect lead performance from Ronnie Barker); that most amiable of panel games, Call My Bluff; the unbelievably erudite (by contemporary standards) music quiz Face the Music; Simon Schama's finest work, Landscape and Memory; and now – The Sea of Faith, Don Cupitt's epic series, now 40 years old, on the history of Christian belief, which popularised the idea of 'non-realist' faith, and even led to the launch of a 'Sea of Faith' network of like-minded Christians. Such thinking was at the time highly controversial, and Cupitt found himself under attack from believers and atheists alike. He also found himself famous – to the point where he had to wear dark glasses in the street to avoid being buttonholed by passersby every few yards. Cupitt, now 90 but clearly in full possession of his marbles, recalls this strange notoriety in a short introduction to the series. He says he greatly enjoyed making The Sea of Faith, which was genuinely what so many series today claim to be – a journey of exploration – but gave the impression that he has since journeyed far beyond its theology, into realms of ever greater uncertainty, though he remains, like Wittgenstein, 'incurably religious by temperament' (like many of us). 
Watching The Sea of Faith today – I've so far seen the first two parts – I was struck, of course, by how much more serious, incisive and spacious it is than anything that would get made today, and I found, to my surprise, that I had remembered quite a lot of it. One feature stands out, and marks it as a product of its time – the amount of attention Cupitt pays to Freud, a figure who was held in much higher esteem 40 years ago than he is today. But it's a wonderful series, well worth watching again, and I'm looking forward to seeing the rest of it. 

Wednesday, 20 November 2024

Name That Writer

 Here's a question that I think would flummox everyone in any literary quiz: 
Whose first novel begins with this sentence? 

'In this dream where he was weightless and unalive, where he was a pervading mist of consciousness that seethed and trembled in a vast stretch of dark, there was at first no feeling, only a dim sort of apperception, eyeless, brainless and remote, whose singular ability was to differentiate between himself and the darkness.'

Give up? Well, here's a clue, or rather more than a clue. This same writer's third novel begins like this: 

'William Stoner entered the University of Missouri as a freshman in the year 1910, at the age of nineteen. Eight years later, during the height of World War I, he received his Doctor of Philosophy degree and accepted an instructorship at the same university, where he taught until his death in 1956. He did not rise above the rank of assistant professor, and few students remembered him with any sharpness after they had taken his course... Stoner's colleagues, who held him in no particular esteem when he was alive, speak of him rarely now; to the older ones, his name is a reminder of the end that awaits them all, to the younger ones it is merely a sound which evokes no sense of the past and no identity with which they can associate themselves or their careers.'

Yes, it's John Williams, whose masterpiece Stoner, after being barely noticed for years, broke through and became a massive hit somewhere around 2010 (45 years after it was published). I've read Stoner at least twice, and written about it (e.g. here), but had never come across a book about Stoner until a blog friend warmly recommended one to me – William Stoner and the Battle for the Inner Life by Steve Almond. This recommendation was then equally warmly withdrawn, but by then I'd picked up a copy of the book, so, intrigued, I started in to read it. 
I soon discovered both why my friend had recommended it, and why he had so dramatically changed his mind. Almond's book begins as an interesting, often incisive, if sometimes overheated study of Williams's book, written in the light of Almond's amazed discovery of it when he was fresh from a 'creative writing' course and so steeped in 'show, don't tell' dogma that he could scarcely believe his eyes when he read that opening paragraph of Stoner. So far, so good, but as the book goes on, Almond himself, who is clearly a rather tiresome, self-advertising type, elbows his way to centre stage. He, his life story, his marital history, his political views (anti-Trump, you'll be astounded to learn  – clearly this is a man who doesn't mind going out on a limb) become the subject, rather than Stoner. This is a shame, because embedded in this book is the germ of a much better, and shorter, one – perhaps a long essay. It's a pity Almond was so fascinated by himself that he couldn't keep his gaze (which is often acute) focused on Stoner. I gave up well before the end. 

Tuesday, 19 November 2024

James and the Great Masticator

 There is a lot of talk these days, in the kind of places where these things are discussed, of the health benefits of thorough and lengthy chewing of food. Haven't we been here before, I thought, as I came across something on this theme... We have indeed, and after a little brain-racking the word came back to me – 'Fletcherism'. This was one of the great health fads of the golden age of health fads around the turn of the twentieth century, and one of the most successful. The brainchild of Horace Fletcher – artist, writer, businessman, opera house manager (in New Orleans), art dealer (in San Francisco) – Fletcherism taught that the key to health and strength, weight loss, happiness and long life was to chew every mouthful of food so thoroughly that it was reduced to a tasteless pulp, more liquid than solid; only then was it safe to swallow the stuff. It seemed to do the trick for Horace himself, restoring him to vigorous health after he went into a decline in his middle age. The Great Masticator was a brilliant self-publicist and a forceful personality, and he made a fortune from his theory, buying various homes around the world, one of them a Venetian palazzo, where he lived some of the time with his artist wife and entertained his celebrity disciples. Alas, in the end he took his theory too far, in effect starving himself to death, and dying of bronchitis at the age of 69. 
  Among his followers were various literary men, including Mark Twain, Upton Sinclair – and Henry James (along with his brother William). In January 1904 Henry wrote to William: 'I continue to found my life on Fletcher. He is immense – thanks to which I am getting much less so.' With Henry, the infatuation didn't last, and by 1909, he seemed to be abandoning the Great Masticator (at least, that appears to be the sense of this tangled passage from a letter of that date): 
'There are other things, or mainly one other — which I might sum up as being at last, again, definitely & unmistakably, the finally proved cul-de-sac or defeat of literal Fletcherism — might so sum up if I could go at all into the difficult & obscure subject by letter. I can’t do so — though I will return to it on some future writing, & after more results from my of late — that is these last 3 months’ very trying experience — which has abated since queer lights (on too prolonged Fletcherism) have more & more distinctly & relievingly come to me. But meanwhile communicate nothing distressful to poor dear H.F. if he is in America — his malady of motion, a perfect St. Vitus’s Dance of the déplacement-mania, make me never know where he is. I am worrying out my salvation — very interesting work & prospects, I think, much aiding — & “going into” the whole fearsome history intelligibly this way is an effort from which I recoil.'
   Others remained faithful to Fletcherism – including, of all people, Franz Kafka. He was so thorough a masticator that, according to food historian Margaret Barnett, his father hid behind his newspaper at mealtimes 'to avoid watching the writer Fletcherise'. 

Sunday, 17 November 2024

Stirring Stuff

 The new issue of 'the real reader's quarterly', Slightly Foxed, is out, and, as ever, it's full of good stuff, including pieces on Jane Welsh Carlyle's letters, Updike's Couples, Lucky Jim, Edward Gorey and Georges Simenon. There's also this, by me, in which I look back to a time when people would read, memorise and happily recite the kind of 'good bad' verse that stirred the blood...

Bernie Taupin and I have one thing (and only one, I suspect) in common. Catching an interview with him on the radio recently, I discovered that the man who wrote the words for all those Elton John hits was, like me, reared on recitations of stirring narrative verse, mostly from the Victorian age.
In his case, it was his mother and maternal grandfather who had quantities of the stuff by heart and would recite it at the drop of a hat; in my case, it was my father, and his preferred time of day for poetry was the morning, often while he was shaving. To this day, I cannot hear or read Newbolt’s ‘Vitai Lampada’ (‘There’s a breathless hush in the Close tonight – Ten to make and the match to win…’) or Macaulay’s ‘Horatius’ (‘Lars Porsena of Clusium by the nine gods he swore…’) or Tennyson’s ‘A Ballad of the Fleet’ (‘At Flores in the Azores Sir Richard Grenville lay, And a pinnace, like a fluttered bird, came flying from far away…’) without being transported back to the chilly bathroom of an Edwardian house in Ealing, where my father is lathering his face with shaving soap and reciting from memory his favourite poetry.
 Part of his delight in such verse was no doubt that it reconnected him with his post-Edwardian boyhood and his charmed schooldays. He surely enjoyed ¬– who wouldn’t? – the strong rhythms and rhymes that are a feature of so much narrative verse, and he relished expressions of patriotic sentiment, courage under fire, morally upright behaviour, the excitement of action, a fight in a good cause – all themes that were already unfashionable when he was a young man, not that he would have cared.
There was one anthology that was so important to him that he bought a copy to keep him company when he was serving in Palestine during the war. I still have that copy, inscribed with his name, regiment and number, and carrying the label of the Modern Library & Stationery Store, Jaffa & Haifa. The anthology is Lyra Heroica: A Book of Verse for Boys, edited by William Ernest Henley, the peg-legged poet whose wooden leg and overpowering presence partly inspired his friend Robert Louis Stevenson’s creation of Long John Silver. The epigraph, from Scott, on the title page gives some idea of the tone: ‘Sound, sound the clarion, fill the fife, To all the sensual world proclaim, One crowded hour of glorious life Is worth an age without a name.’ Stirring stuff indeed.
In his short preface, Henley reaffirms that his selection is aimed at boys, and that it represents only ‘the simpler sentiments, and the more elemental emotions’. And yet, reading it now, it seems to me that, for all its emphasis on stirring narrative, it actually makes a useful introduction to a far wider field of English poetry, from Shakespeare and Drayton (both on Agincourt) to Henley himself, represented by three works, including his most enduring, ‘Invictus’ (‘Out of the night that covers me, Black at the pit from pole to pole, I thank whatever gods may be For my unconquerable soul…’). Along the way there is much that is quieter and more inward-looking than might be expected: George Herbert’s beautiful ‘Memento Mori’ (‘Sweet day, so cool, so calm, so bright – The bridal of the earth and sky – The dew shall weep thy fall tonight, For thou must die…’), Milton’s ‘Lycidas’, Gray’s ‘Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard’, Samuel Johnson’s lines on the death of Dr Robert Levet (‘Condemn’d to Hope’s delusive mine, As on we toil from day to day…’). Henley even includes Marvell’s Horatian Ode Upon Cromwell’s Return from Ireland, a poem that cleverly subverts the very triumph it appears to celebrate. Blake’s ‘The Tyger’ appears under the heading ‘The Beauty of Terror’ – Henley likes to add his own titles, to point a moral: Keats’s great sonnet ‘On First Looking into Chapman’s Homer’ is headed, bizarrely, ‘To the Adventurous’.
 John Greenleaf Whittier’s ‘Barbara Frietchie’, a favourite of my father’s, is here (‘“Shoot, if you must, this old grey head, But spare your country’s flag,” she said …’), as is another favourite, Francis Hastings Doyle’s ‘The Private of the Buffs’ (‘Last night, among his fellow roughs, He jested, quaffed and swore; A drunken private of the Buffs, Who never looked before…’). Others that made a big impression on the boyhood me include Byron’s thrilling ‘Sennacherib’ (‘The Assyrian came down like the wolf on the fold…’) and ‘The Isles of Greece’ (‘where burning Sappho loved and sung’). Surprisingly absent are Tennyson’s ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ and Kipling’s ‘If’, but they were in my father’s repertoire anyway, as was (on a good day) the whole of Chesterton’s ‘Lepanto’, which he probably took from another anthology we had on our shelves, the more straightforwardly literary A Book of Narrative Verse, an Oxford World’s Classic dating from 1930. ‘Lepanto’, a gorgeously coloured account of the great naval confrontation between the Holy League and the Ottoman Empire, stirred me more than almost anything I heard in my boyhood. Who could resist the opening lines? ‘White founts falling in the Courts of the sun, And the Soldan of Byzantium is smiling as they run; There is laughter like fountains in that face of all men feared, It stirs the forest darkness, the darkness of his beard, It curls the blood-red crescent, the crescent of his lips, For the inmost sea of all the earth is shaken with his ships…’).
I never managed to learn the whole thing myself, but back in those days, when I still had a retentive memory, I did commit some quite long poems to memory – inspired, of course, by my father’s impromptu recitations. Though sadly I can no longer retain any great quantity of verse, I still believe that learning ‘by heart’ is an excellent way of really getting to know a poem, to know it, as it were, from the inside – and the same goes for reading aloud. The musicality of a poem, how it sounds when read out loud as well as in the head, is essential to its nature, and both learning by heart and reading aloud can open up a poem to us more effectively than just reading it on the page. And yet it seems that both are now largely things of the past.
 In the Introduction to The Faber Popular Reciter (1978), Kingsley Amis, its editor, strikes an elegiac note: ‘When I was a schoolboy before the Second World War,’ he writes, ‘the majority of the poems in this book were too well known to be worth reprinting. If they were not in one anthology they were in a couple of others; they were learned by heart and recited in class, or performed as turns at grown-up gatherings … Most of that, together with much else, has gone.’ Despite its name, his anthology is, Amis insists, for reading aloud – sharing a poem with like-minded friends (or harmlessly showing off), and quoting rather than reciting. He recognises that much popular verse is ‘good bad verse’, but, as Orwell wrote, ‘a good bad poem is a graceful monument to the obvious. It records in memorable form … some emotion which nearly every human being can share.’
 Amis’s anthology, which includes some hymns and songs, is, in its less overtly sinew-stiffening way, every bit as stirring as Lyra Heroica (and it does include ‘If’ and ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’). It represents the poetry that lingered in the mind of a man raised at a certain time, a time when learning by heart and recitation were standard ways of engaging with poetry, and when poetry – the ‘good bad poetry’ of popular verse, hymns and songs – was everywhere, in a way it no longer is. If all that was already gone in 1978, how much more so is it now.
However, there are occasional signs that something survives. Kipling’s ‘If’ clearly lives on, coming top in a nationwide poll of favourite poems in 1995 (with Tennyson’s ‘The Lady of Shallot’ and Walter de la Mare’s ‘The Listeners’ a rather surprising second and third). I suspect it would come top again if the poll was repeated. In 2009 the film Invictus told how the imprisoned Nelson Mandela read Henley’s poem of that name on a scrap of paper and drew strength from it. This inspired various politicians, including our own Gordon Brown, to claim that they too had been inspired by the poem, and when Prince Harry founded his games for disabled veterans in 2014, he christened them the Invictus Games.
Perhaps, paraphrasing Tennyson’s ‘Ulysses’, we could say that, though much is taken, much abides… However, there is no denying that the poetry-infused world recalled by Kingsley Amis has, sadly, long gone. Those of us who caught the tail end of it, like me and Bernie Taupin, are surely the better for having been exposed at an early age to all that stirring verse, recited with gusto. In my case, it laid the foundations for a lifelong love of poetry – even if, alas, it didn’t make a millionaire songwriter of me.

Friday, 15 November 2024

Hélène de Montgeroult

 This morning on Radio 3 I heard a hauntingly beautiful piece for violin and piano which stopped me in my tracks. It turned out to be the slow movement of a violin sonata by Hélène de Montgeroult, a composer I'd heard of, but knew nothing about. Consulting Professor Wiki, I discovered that this was a woman who had a most remarkable life, being captured and imprisoned by Austrians in Piedmont in 1793, narrowly escaping the guillotine during the Reign of Terror in Paris, and going on to become the first woman professor of music at the Paris Conservatoire. She was a prodigious pianist, improviser and pedagogue, and a composer (at a time when women composers were something of a rarity) who, when she died in 1836, left behind a large body of work, mostly for piano, which is only now being rediscovered and recorded. Read more about her here...
And here is the piece I heard this morning.