Christina the Astonishing

Today is the feast day of St Christina the Astonishing, a 12th-century saint from Sint-Truiden, in what is now Belgium. Having suffered a massive seizure of some kind, she was taken for dead, but in the midst of her funeral service 'she arose full of vigour, stupefying with amazement the whole city of Sint-Truiden'. She had, she said, visited Heaven, Hell and Purgatory, and now, on her return, she could not bear the smell of the sinful people gathered in the church. She duly levitated up to the rafters to escape the stench, and hovered there for some while. 
  On returning to terra firma, Christina embraced a life of extreme destitution and privation, shunning human contact and seeking out anything that would cause her to suffer. According to accounts of her life, she would throw herself into burning furnaces, suffering agonies but emerging quite unhurt. In the depths of winter she would fling herself into the river Meuse, spending hours or even days in the icy waters, praying and begging for mercy. Sometimes she would allow herself to be carried down to a mill, where the mill wheel 'whirled her round in a manner frightful to behold', but of course she emerged unscathed. This – and absolutely nothing else – Christina had in common with the far from saintly Laurence Sterne, who, as a boy in Ireland, had once fallen into a mill-race and been carried right round the wheel (had 'been through the mill'), but emerged, like the saint, quite unharmed. 
  In later life Christina the Astonishing quietened down, living, surprisingly, to the age of 74. Fans of Nick Cave might recall that he tells something of her story in his song 'Christina the Astonishing', from the 1992 album Henry's Dream...

  

5,002: All These Birds

 I've just noticed that I have now exceeded 5,000 posts on this blog – Butterflies, Proms, Ibsen was number 5,000. I would never have seen that coming when I tentatively launched this Hedonic Resource on the world back in 2008. 
   Anyway, I reckon it's time for a poem, so here's a gem by Richard Wilbur. In the collection Things of This World (1956), 'All These Birds' comes immediately before 'A Baroque Wall Fountain in the Villa Sciarra' (IMHO his finest poem), and there is a similar energy in the way the stanzas flow into each other, building to a great affirmation of the primacy of imagination and of love. 

All These Birds

                 Agreed that all these birds,
 hawk or heavenly lark or heard-of nightingale,
        Perform upon the kitestrings of our sight
        In a false distance, that the day and night
        Are full of wingèd words
                                                gone rather stale,
               That nothing is so worn
               As Philomel’s bosom-thorn,

               That it is, in fact, the male
Nightingale which sings, and that all these creatures wear
        Invisible armor such as Hébert beheld
        His water-ousel through, as, wrapped or shelled
        In a clear bellying veil
                                            or a bubble of air,
               It bucked the flood to feed
               at the stream-bottom. Agreed
               That the sky is a vast claire
In which the gull, despite appearances, is not
       Less claustral than the oyster in its beak
       And dives like nothing human; that we seek
       Vainly to know the heron
                                                (but can plot
               What angle of the light
               Provokes its northern flight.)
               
               Let them be polyglot
And wordless then, those boughs that spoke with Solomon
        In Hebrew canticles, and made him wise;
        And let a clear and bitter wind arise
        To storm into the hotbeds
                                                 of the sun,
              and there, beyond a doubt,
              Batter the Phoenix out.

              Let us, with glass or gun,
Watch (from our clever blinds) the monsters of the sky
        Dwindle to habit, habitat, and song,
        And tell the imagination it is wrong
        Till, lest it be undone,
                                           it spin a lie
               So fresh, so pure, so rare
               As to possess the air.

               Why should it be more shy
Than chimney-nesting storks, or sparrows on a wall?
         Oh, let it climb wherever it can cling
         Like some great trumpet-vine, a natural thing
         To which all birds that fly
                                                  come natural.
               Come, stranger, sister, dove:
               Put on the reins of love.

The 'Water-Ousel' is the bird we call the Dipper, and the reference is to a passage in Buffon's Natural History of Birds describing the Dipper's habit of walking about on the bottom of fast-flowing streams. 'We are indebted to M. Hébert,' writes Buffon, 'for the first account of this extraordinary habit, which I know not to belong to any other bird.' But who was this Hébert? Surely not the fervent revolutionary Jacques Hébert – or did he pass the time watching birds when he wasn't engaged in guillotining aristocrats and attempting to destroy Christianity? 
   As it happens, I was watching a Dipper by the river in Buxton, back in number 5,000. 

Ivy

 Just for the record – I recently wrote a piece on Ivy Compton-Burnett for Engelsberg Ideas.
Here's a link...

https://engelsbergideas.com/notebook/ivy-compton-burnetts-forgotten-genius/ 

Butterflies, Proms, Ibsen

 I spent most of the weekend in Derbyshire with my cousin, revisiting Buxton – the riverside gardens really are very fine – and, yesterday, taking a walk in and around Bradford Dale. As we wandered amid an astonishing abundance of butterflies – painted ladies, peacocks, red admirals, commas, gatekeepers, meadow browns, ringlets, blues and whites (sadly only one tortoiseshell) – it occurred to me that I haven't really said anything about this wonderful butterfly season. The profusion of painted ladies is not quite as prodigious as in the annus mirabilis of 2009 (when an estimated billion of them swept over the country), but I'm sure in many places it is not far short – and peacocks are having a remarkable year, with huge numbers of early fliers followed by even larger numbers of high-season specimens. It seems much the same could be said of most species – thanks largely to the summer being properly warm – so I'm wondering how the alarmists of Butterfly Conservation will spin this one into a bad news story. No doubt they'll rise to the challenge...
   Also in Derbyshire, we watched the First Night of the Proms, enjoying the Copland and Gershwin, the staggeringly talented Yuncham Lim playing Ravel, Finzi's rarely performed For Saint Cecilia – and conductor Dalia Stasevska's kimonos. Then they went and spoiled it all with the finale – the joint forces of the BBC Singers and the BBC Symphony Orchestra belting out the dreary and tiresome 'Wonderwall'. Surely, with the music of Oasis being so closely associated with 'Andy' Burnham, the BBC could have stopped this happening on the eve of his coronation. It felt very like a celebration, and the BBC has surely swooned more than enough over the King of the North.
  And we also, for reasons that I won't go into here, watched on BBC iPlayer a 1982 production of Ibsen's Little Eyolf, starring Anthony Hopkins and Diana Rigg. It's a play I had never seen before, and the first act, in which everything happens, struck me as completely bonkers. The next two acts, in which everyone talks, did nothing to improve my opinion of Ibsen, a playwright whose works I once studied but am, alas, unlikely ever to return to. Still, it was a great weekend 

Max Gate

 Well, my impulse purchase of Damien Wilkins's Max Gate turned out to be a good one. Since I last mentioned it, I have finished reading it (at my usual snail's pace), and found it thoroughly enjoyable (apart from a few jarring anachronisms – 'Okay', 'in denial', 'basically'). It's actually the second Thomas Hardy-related novel I've read, the other being Howard Jacobson's scabrous Peeping Tom, the narrator of which is obsessed by Hardy, whom he regards as a 'prurient little Victorian ratbag' – a case he makes rather effectively. Hardy doesn't come out of Max Gate too well either: the great man is self-absorbed, touchy, obsessed with his reputation and his legacy, grossly insensitive to those around him, especially the women (unless he has a crush on them), and apparently more caring about animals than his fellow humans. The narrator, Nellie Titterington, a housemaid, is very clear-eyed about her master, but she is telling the story with the benefit of hindsight: the action is set in 1928, and Nellie, who escaped domestic service, is writing some decades later. 
   The second half of the book is more interesting than the first, as Florence Hardy, the author's unfortunate (and much younger) second wife, comes to the fore. This poor woman, condemned to type out her husband's autobiography in the third person and pass it off as her biography of him – and obliged to endure his fixation on his dead first wife and his moping over a young actress – is in an awkward position, having begun life at Max Gate as Hardy's typist, so she has some fellow feeling with the servants, and they with her. The other major figures in the narrative are Sydney Cockerell and Sir James Barrie, who are hovering around the dying author, determined to secure him a burial in Westminster Abbey, despite his wish to be buried in his family plot. Florence has a sad crush on Barrie, and Nellie pities her for being 'married to a corpse and swooning over a bronchial eunuch'. The story of what happened to Hardy's body is well known, and has perhaps been slightly embroidered, but it makes a good, if ghoulish, tale (told in a less extreme form here). Wilkins creates a strong sense of place and time, and handles all this material deftly enough, though he has sometimes to modify the narratorial voice with moments of omniscience. The book works well as a black comedy, as well as a convincing window on the airless world of Max Gate, and it is, as I said, a thoroughly enjoyable read.

Best Dog in Italy

 'Imagine if we won the World Cup,' said my seven-year-old grandson yesterday. 'Ah, my child,' I replied, laying a grandfatherly hand on his innocent head, 'we have won before – and I was there.' Actually, of course, I made no such reply, not least because my memories of the great victory are hazy, and I could hardly claim to have 'been there'. While the final played out, I was in fact in deep cover, in a patch of woodland in the local park, with my then girlfriend (I was sixteen, and we weren't botanising). We emerged later and stepped into a café, where the match commentary was playing on a radio. It was only that evening that I saw footage of England's dramatic victory. 
   What I do remember – and told my grandson – is that, at some point, the World Cup (i.e. the Jules Rimet trophy) was stolen, then dug up in woodland by a dog called... what was it? Of course – Pickles. All of thirteen years ago, I wrote about Pickles and his heroic excavation of the 'not very World Cuppy' World Cup, a feat that was once celebrated in a Picklefest event in South Norwood. Here's the link – 

               https://nigeness.blogspot.com/2013/03/south-norwoods-finest-son.html

Sadly, Pickles died just a year after playing his part in football history: his choke chain caught on a tree branch while he was chasing a cat. His collar is on display at the National Football Museum in Manchester. As for the trophy itself, lessons were learnt after its theft (from Methodist Central Hall in Westminster, where it was on display along with a stamp exhibition): it was replaced by a replica for public display. Then, in 1970, the original was presented in perpetuity to Brazil, that year's winners. Perpetuity, alas, lasted only until 1983, when it was stolen from the headquarters of the Brazilian Football Confederation, and most likely melted down. 

Wes

 Last night I found myself watching Wes Anderson's The Royal Tenenbaums again. I say 'again' but I hadn't seen it since I watched it, in a cinema, when it was released, all of 25 years ago. It was the first of his films I'd seen (I only caught up with Bottle Rocket and Rushmore later), and I remember being mightily impressed by the distinctive Wes Anderson style. Since then I've become more familiar with his tricks and mannerisms, that unmistakable look, but I still likes me a bit of Wes, and I greatly enjoyed watching The Royal Ts again, not least for its terrific ensemble cast – Gene Hackman, Anjelica Huston, Bill Murray, Gwyneth Paltrow, Danny Glover, Ben Stiller, Owen and Luke Wilson, all at their best. Two things struck me this time, one being the bookishness of the enterprise – it's framed as the reading of a physical book (as in The Ballad of Buster Scruggs) and books are everywhere in the interior scenes (most noticeably Royal Tenenbaum's set of Encyclopaedia Britannica) – and the other being the music. The soundtrack is wonderful, featuring everything from Satie, Ravel and Enescu to the Beatles and Stones, Dylan, Paul Simon, Nick Drake, and – oh yes – Nico, a voice (if that is the word) that blasted me straight back to my youth. She features twice, with haunting songs written by the teenage Jackson Browne: 'The Fairest of the Season' and this...