Friday, 31 October 2025

Birthdays

 Halloween, Schmalloween – here at Nigeness, 31st October is always Keats's birthday (born 1795, in Moorgate, London, where his father was ostler at the Swan and Hoop inn). 
On this day in 1818, Keats signed off on his long letter to his brother George and his pregnant wife Georgiana, who were trying to start a new life in America. His other brother, Tom, meanwhile was dying of consumption. The letter ends:

'I hope you will have a Son, and it is one of my first wishes to have him in my Arms – which I will do please God before he cuts one double tooth. Tom is rather more easy than he has been; but is still so nervous that I cannot speak to him of these Matters – indeed it is the care I have had to keep his Mind aloof from feelings too acute that has made this Letter so short [!] a one – I did not like to write before him a Letter he knew was to reach your hands – I cannot even now ask him for any Message – his heart speaks to you – Be as happy as you can. Think of me and for my sake be cheerful. Believe me my dear Brother and Sister

           Your anxious and affectionate Brother
                                                                   John.
   This day is my Birth day –
   All our friends have been anxious in their enquiries and all send their remembrances'

It was Keats's 23rd birthday, and two and a half years later he would be dead of consumption. 

This date is also the birthday (1632, in Delft) of Johannes Vermeer. By Keats's time, he was an almost completely forgotten painter (awaiting rediscovery by the French), so the poet would never have seen his work. One can only imagine what he would have made of the Girl with a Pearl Earring, a painting that, in its sensual intimacy and lovingly observed, all but tangible textures, seems almost a visual analogue of a Keats poem... 


Wednesday, 29 October 2025

The Death of Ralegh

 On this day in 1618, having fallen foul of the monarch once too often, Sir Walter Ralegh, explorer, statesman, soldier and superb writer of poetry and prose, faced death on the scaffold in Old Palace Yard, Westminster. He urged the executioner to make haste, for 'at this hour my ague comes upon me. I would not have my enemies think I quaked from fear.' Inspecting the blade that was to dispatch him, he remarked, 'This is a sharp medicine, but it is a physician for all diseases and miseries.' With his last words, he urged the hesitating executioner to strike: 'What dost thou fear? Strike, man, strike!' Men knew how to die in those days. 

  'What is our life?' Ralegh asked in a poem – 

'What is our life? The play of passion.
Our mirth? The music of division:
Our mothers’ wombs the tiring-houses be,
Where we are dressed for life’s short comedy.
The earth the stage; Heaven the spectator is,
Who sits and views whosoe’er doth act amiss.
The graves which hide us from the scorching sun
Are like drawn curtains when the play is done.
Thus playing post we to our latest rest,
And then we die in earnest, not in jest.'


On the eve of his execution, he answered his question again – a dusty answer:

'Even such is time, which takes in trust
Our youth, our joys, and all we have,
And pays us but with age and dust,
Who in the dark and silent grave
When we have wandered all our ways
Shuts up the story of our days,
And from which earth, and grave, and dust
The Lord will raise me up, I trust.'

After his execution, Ralegh's head was embalmed and given to his wife. His body was to be buried at St Mary's, Beddington (one of my old Surrey haunts), but it ended up at St Margaret's, Westminster. Lady Ralegh reportedly kept her husband's head in a velvet bag for the rest of her life, after which it was reunited with the rest of Sir Walter's body at St Margaret's. 

Monday, 27 October 2025

Austen Statues

 I see that another statue of Jane Austen has been unveiled, this time in Winchester Cathedral close. Fair enough – it's her 250th anniversary year, and she died at Winchester and is buried in the cathedral. The statue is by Martin Jennings, who has a good record with this sort of thing, having created the excellent statue of Philip Larkin in Hull (a 'major statue of concern', according to the city council, who at the time were dancing to the tune of Black Lives Matter) and the even better John Betjeman at St Pancras station. The trouble with Jane Austen is, of course, that we have no good idea of what she actually looked like, the only reliable image being an amateurish sketch by her sister Cassandra. Jennings (who's pictured above, at the left of the group of three worthies) has posed her as a forceful, even defiant figure, with head held high and chest thrown out, her face set almost grimly as she gazes off to her left, while her right hand rests on her famous little writing table. It's certainly well done, but is it Jane Austen? It seems to me that it doesn't suggest anything of her quiet, observant humour. For that, I think the bust of Austen that stands in the town of Alton is more suggestive, though it is of lower quality as sculpture.

And there's another Jane Austen statue in Hampshire, outside the museum in Basingstoke. This one shows her in motion (like Jennings's statue of Larkin), walking across the marketplace with her outdoor clothes on and a book under her arm. As with the Winchester Cathedral statue, she seems a more angular and austere figure than the Jane portrayed in her sister's sketch, or the one that shows through in the writings of those who knew her. Not that it matters. At least none of these Austen statues have plumbed the depths of recent efforts portraying Diana and the late Queen, and for that we – and the shade of Jane – should be grateful.


[Please ignore the Google links in the above. They crept in while I wasn't looking.]

Sunday, 26 October 2025

'Dignified, but flippant'

 Heaven knows how many Penguin books must have passed through my hands in the course of my reading life. They've always been there, right from my boyhood, when my father, for some reason, kept shelves of Penguins, mostly Crime, in the lavatory. I read some of those, then many many more over the years. But, in all my Penguin-reading life, I don't think it ever occurred to me to wonder how the imprint got its name – it just seemed a given. Now (thanks to a pair of penguin-related books I'm reading for review) I know how the name came about. The story goes that publisher Allen Lane, determined to bring out a range of quality paperback books at an affordable price and needing a name for it, was discussing the matter with his secretary, who suggested Penguin, because the birds are 'dignified, but flippant'. Fair enough, said Lane (or words to that effect), and sent an office junior, 21-year-old Edward Young, down to London Zoo to sketch one of the (Humboldt) penguins that were then enjoying themselves in the newly installed, Lubetkin-designed penguin pool. He returned with a sheet of sketches, Lane selected one, and the rest is history...
  This, of course, was in the dark days before highly paid brand consultants and their brilliant ideas, e.g. rebranding Royal Mail as Consignia and W.H. Smith as T.G. Jones – but somehow the 'dignified but flippant' penguin turned out to be just about the most successful brand in publishing. Ninety years on, it's still going strong. 


Friday, 24 October 2025

'All hail to the Queen of the Mist'

 On this day in 1901, Annie Edson Taylor ensured her place in the annals of human folly by going over Niagara Falls in a barrel. It was her 63rd birthday, though she claimed to be 20 years younger, and she entered the barrel – custom-built of oak and iron and padded with a mattress – wearing a flowing black dress and a flowery hat, and carrying her lucky heart-shaped pillow. The barrel was launched into the water near Goat Island on the American side, and was eventually carried over at the Canadian Horseshoe Falls. Amazingly, when the barrel was opened Mrs Edson Taylor was found alive, with only a little bruising and a gash on her head. Soon after, she declared that, 'If it was with my dying breath, I would caution anyone against attempting the feat ... I would sooner walk up to the mouth of a cannon, knowing it was going to blow me to pieces than make another trip over the Fall.' Which seems reasonable. 
  Annie Edson Taylor, who had fallen on hard times, was hoping that the venture would make her money. She embarked on a speaking tour and wrote a memoir, but her manager ran away with her barrel, and she spent most of her savings hiring private detectives to track it down. After it was eventually found in Chicago, it was stolen again by her next manager. She spent her latter years posing for photographs at her Niagara Falls souvenir stand, while pursuing various other abortive ventures, including trying to write a novel, and working as a clairvoyant. When she died, more or less penniless, her funeral was paid for by public subscription. A sad end, but at least she had won the distinction of being the first person to go over Niagara Falls in a barrel and survive. Her feat was celebrated in several poems, including this effort by one John Joseph O'Regan, with its curious rhyming  – 

'All hail to the Queen of the Mist,
Brave Anna Edson Taylor;
She has beaten all former records,
By her courage, grit and valor.'

and this, by P.M. Reynolds: 

'Since earth’s creation down the stormy way,
All human feats have been surpassed today.
Mrs Edson Taylor, in her barrel sound,
Through the wild rapids did in safety bound.'




Thursday, 23 October 2025

Corvo Ludens

 In Worthing, the dogs are back on the beach (from which they are banned from May to September) and are happily chasing balls thrown by their obliging owners. And now the crows, of which there are legions, are joining in. Keeping a beady eye on what's going on, as they always do, they have taken to swooping down and grabbing the ball before the dog can reach it, flying off a little distance, then tossing it down to the ground again for the dog to retrieve (or not, if the crow changes its mind and picks it up again). The crows seem to be having as much fun as the dogs, playing this game. I didn't see it myself, but it has been reported by reliable witnesses, and, really, it's not all that surprising: as well as being highly intelligent, crows do seem to enjoy a game. Among other frivolous pursuits, they particularly enjoy sliding down slopes, hanging upside-down from branches, and hiding non-edible objects just for the hell of it. Playing with dogs on the beach might  be seen as just another step in the triumphant progress of the corvids. In my boyhood, crows (Carrion Crows) were a country bird that didn't often show up in town, and it was still true that if you saw a solitary bird it would be a crow, and if you saw a flock they'd be rooks. Now huge numbers of crows are all over our towns and suburbs, along with other former country-dwellers – magpies, jackdaws, jays. Even ravens are now turning up in town, and only the rook remains a country bird. The corvids, love them or loathe them, have been a huge avian success story. For myself, I've always been fond of crows, for all their deplorable ways. I'm with Kay Ryan on this one – 

Felix Crow

Crow school
is basic and
short as a rule—
just the rudiments
of quid pro crow
for most students.
Then each lives out
his unenlightened
span, adding his
bit of blight
to the collected
history of pushing out
the sweeter species;
briefly swaggering the
swagger of his
aggravating ancestors
down my street.
And every time
I like him
when we meet.



Sunday, 19 October 2025

'The air deals blows...'

 On a blustery, rainy, altogether miserable afternoon, I found myself thinking, inevitably, of Philip Larkin. I knew his uncollected autumn poem of 1961 – 

'And now the leaves suddenly lose strength.
Decaying towers stand still, lurid, lanes-long,
And seen from landing windows, or the length
Of gardens, rubricate afternoons. New strong
Rain-bearing night-winds come: then
Leaves chase warm buses, speckle statued air,
Pile up in corners, fetch out vague broomed men
Through mists at morning.

And no matter where goes down,
The sallow lapsing drift in fields
Or squares behind hoardings, all men hesitate
Separately, always, seeing another year gone –
Frockcoated gentleman, farmer at his gate,
Villein with mattock, soldiers on their shields,
All silent, watching the winter coming on.'

But there is also this one, 'Autumn', another uncollected poem, written in 1953, which emphasises the violence of the season –

'The air deals blows: surely too hard, too often?
No: it is bent on bringing summer down.
Dead leaves desert in thousands, outwards, upwards,
Numerous as birds; but the birds fly away,

And the blows sound on, like distant collapsing water,
Or empty hospitals falling room by room
Down in the west, perhaps, where the angry light is.
Then rain starts; the year goes suddenly slack.

O rain, o frost, so much has still to be cleared:
All this ripeness, all this reproachful flesh,
And summer, that keeps returning like a ghost
Of something death has merely made beautiful,

And night skies so brilliantly spread-eagled
With their sharp hint of a journey–all must disperse
Before the season is lost and anonymous,
Like a London court one is never sure of finding

But none the less exists, at the back of the fog,
Bare earth, a lamp, scrapers. Then it will be time
To seek there that ill-favoured, curious house,
Bar up the door, mantle the fat flame,

And sit once more alone with sprawling papers,
Bitten-up letters, boxes of photographs,
And the case of butterflies so rich it looks
As if all summer settled there and died.

The image of the 'London court one is never sure of finding' sends the poem into unexpected, mysterious territory. What is 'that ill-favoured, curious house', with its sprawling papers and bitten-up letters? Perhaps it's an image of Larkin's imagination, or his life – but then the blaze of colour with that case of butterflies! That is quite a way to end an autumn poem...

And tomorrow I'm off to Worthing again for a few days, where the autumn wind will be fierce. I should be posting again in a few days. 

Saturday, 18 October 2025

That Book

I've just realised that it was six years ago today that I announced to the world that my book The Mother of Beauty was available on Amazon. Looking back, I'm amazed that I managed to produce the whole thing, unaided, on Microsoft Word, and – not unaided – get it onto Amazon. Those two endeavours were far harder than writing it. As I remember, the book sold a hundred or two at a steady trickle, but then came a rave review in a certain national newspaper, my stocks disappeared over one weekend, and I found myself trying to organise a quick reprint while I was out of the country, staying with the New Zealand family. Demand was such that a Portland, Oregon, outfit with the same name as my nominal publisher was besieged with inquiries and had to put up a prominent notice declaring that it had nothing to do with my book (in fact it specialises in books on 'love, sexuality and relational ethics' – not quite my line). By the time the reprint was available, demand had of course fallen away, so the moment had gone, along with my chances of even covering the printing costs, let alone making any money. Hey ho, that's life.
Anyway, as a result of all that, I still have a couple of boxes of The Mother of Beauty under the bed. It appears to be still available on Amazon, though they tell me my account has defunged. If anyone still wants a copy, it's yours for a tenner, including postage and packaging. Just mail me at nigeandrew@gmail.com. Christmas is coming...


Friday, 17 October 2025

Oscar's Library Ticket


 I suppose it was a nice gesture by the British Library to reinstate Oscar Wilde's reader's pass for what was then the British Museum Reading Room, though it is clear that its original revocation had nothing to do with the nature of his crime (as it then was). It was routine for anyone with a criminal conviction to lose their reader's pass; there is no particular need for expiation. Oscar's library card, with its 1900 expiry date,  has been handed to his grandson Merlin Holland, who, as it happens, has just published After Oscar, a great doorstop of a book about Wilde's later life.
  The British Library has various Wilde manuscripts, including that of De Profundis, which was not published in full until 1962. Merlin Holland seems to think very highly of it, saying that 'people have written to me saying, "In a moment of terrible depression about my own life I read De Profundis, and I just wanted you to know that your grandfather's letter from prison meant so much to me".' I remember reading it myself years ago, and the effect certainly wasn't cheering: it seemed to me an overlong and surprisingly dull exercise in self-justification, and indeed self-aggrandisement (at one point, I seem to recall, Wilde comes close to identifying himself with Christ). And it didn't even cure him of his dangerous addiction to the ghastly Lord Alfred Douglas. 

For something lighter on a Wildean theme, I would suggest seeking out Max Beerbohm's extraordinary early essay, 'A Peep into the Past' – you won't be sorry. 



Wednesday, 15 October 2025

Hart 100

 Born 100 years ago today was the artist and broadcaster Tony Hart. When he died back in 2009, I wrote a bit about him on this blog – 
'A talented, inventive and exceptionally deft artist, capable of working fast on a large or small scale, he presented children's art programmes that were genuinely inspiring. Everything was pitched at exactly the right level – these were projects you could attempt and actually succeed with – and of course there was the added spur of The Gallery, in which the best of the pictures sent in by viewers were displayed. But what made it all so compelling and heartening was that Tony was so transparently a nice and decent man. Sadly, in his later years, he suffered the cruellest blow an artist can face – the loss of the use of his hands – but he had already done more in inspiring generations of children to get painting and drawing than anyone ever did before of ever will in the future. As with the great Postgate [Oliver Postgate had died in the same year], we shall not see his like again.
Footnote: Some years ago, I was on an Italian bus, coming down into Positano, and as we reached the edge of town, there he was, striding along the pavement – Tony Hart. I was quite ridiculously cheered by the sight of him – but I suspect he had that effect on everybody, and that was part of his success. He spread a lot of happiness.'
   Bizarrely, a surge of tributes to Hart erupted on social media six years later, in 2015, when someone put up a newspaper report of his death on Facebook, having not noticed the dateline on the piece, and it was then republished on Twitter.  Well, Hart was worthy of all the tributes going, so fair enough. 

Tuesday, 14 October 2025

Wilbur's Precept and Richard Howard

 My most recent charity bookshop purchase was a slim volume of essays by Clive James titled Latest Readings. 'Essays' is pushing it, actually: most of these pieces are little more than jottings occasioned by James's most recent reading and rereading in the long period of relapse before his  death. As he says, 'If you don't know the exact moment when the lights will go out, you might as well read until they do.' One of the more substantial pieces is 'Richard Wilbur's Precept', the precept being that 'in poetry, all the revolutions are palace revolutions'. Wilbur's essay, 'Poetry's Debt to Poetry' strikes James as 'the ideal lesson, for beginning students, in how to think about the way the poetic heritage is handed down through the generations'. Poetry, in other words, is born of poetry, and the way to become a poet is to read poetry – the poetry of the past, needless to say. This is a lesson anyone aspiring to write poetry should learn and inwardly digest – as too few, alas, do. 
  James moves on to consider his enduring pockets of ignorance, even after a lifetime of reading and writing poetry. Surprisingly, he had never come across Edgar Bowers, but a less surprising name perhaps is Richard Howard, a poet I had never heard of till I read this essay. His Wikipedia entry will give you the facts – including that he 'read French letters [fnar fnar] at the Sorbonne'. As James notes, 'brevity is not in his gift, or anyway not among his interests', but Howard's poems in which he imagines letters and monologues of historical figures from the 19th century seem richly rewarding.  Here is 'Venetian Interior, 1889', which James describes as 'a sumptuous piece of work, a boutique with the range of a supermarket'. Written very much in the manner of Robert Browning, it tells us all we need to know about what happened to that poet's son, Pen...

Stand to one side. No, over here with me:   
out of the light but out of darkness too,   
where everything that is not odd or old
is gold and subjugates the shadows. There,   
now you will be no trouble and behold none—
anything but trouble, at first glance,
last chance to see what I say is worth a look.

This whole palazzo is the property
of a middle-aged and penniless dilettante,
Pen Browning (Robert’s son), who has made terms   
—palatial terms, in fact—with towering
premises afforded by the tact
of his New York heiress, Fannie Coddington   
Browning, dutiful daughter-in-law, doubtful wife.

Yet who would not be full of doubts, perplexed   
at having to define Pen’s talents and finance
his tastes? Their Ca’ Rezzonico itself
is dubious. The ripened fruit of centuries,
rat- and roach-infested, peeling, rank,
withers with each tide that rots the piles,
though apt withal to weather these tenants as well ...

He is painting from the model: Dryope,
undressed of course but draped against the draft   
in a looping swathe of silver-printed stuff   
that seems to move, glistening over flesh—
it does move! lapped in its silver mesh are coils   
of a python wrapped in loving torpor round   
the contadina’s undistracted torso.

The afternoon is numb: Dryope sleeps   
in her pose, the python slips a little
down the umber slope of her thigh, and Pen,   
spired, slaps a dashing curlicue
across his canvas. “I had the Jew come by   
with this brocaded velvet yesterday—
I bargained some old clothes against it, Fan,

so you needn’t ask how much it cost in dollars.”
To whom does Pen speak, his eyes intent, his hands   
“working busily”? Beyond his “subject,” look   
past the unimposing Dryope, look through
the tufts of pampas grass extending up
to the tufa vault whose patination casts
a pall of watery splendor on the scene—

if you manage to overlook the sumptuous junk,   
jasper urns, a suit of Japanese armor,
two stuffed bears, on the divan bearskins too—   
there, or in this atmosphere let me say lo!
on that very divan Robert Browning lolls,
a short and foreshortened colossus with feet of clay   
but the hardest imaginable cranium, among

his son’s possessions slightly ill at ease
though well bestowed on slippery pelts, and plays
(against the wealthy Fannie—see her white shawl?)
at draughts with agate pieces, red and green,
like a page from some old parchment of kings and queens.   
In approbation of his son’s economies   
the old man smiles now—but does she? The skull

interfering with our view of Fannie is,
I believe, or was the Mahdi’s which Pen keeps   
beside his easel (Victorians could make   
anything into a tobacco jar). “I took
my pipe through Cannareggio on a long tramp   
yesterday morning, right into the Ghetto,   
looking for likely faces, which I found!

Didn’t you say, Father, a satisfactory Jew
is worth a dozen Gentiles? The one who sold   
that velvet to me is sure to be ready by Spring:   
for Lear, you know, or Lazarus at least ...”   
Pen chatters on to charm the python, not   
Dryope or Fannie who look up
only when the poet, roused, exclaims—

as rapt before himself as a child in front   
of the Christmas tree: “A satisfactory Jew!   
Setting mere Rothschildsplay aside, Pen,   
I never saw but one in all my life:
Dizzy, I mean—the potent wizard himself,   
at Hampton Court a dozen years ago,   
murmuring at the Queen’s ear like a wasp

who hoped to buzz his way into the diamonds ...   
With that olive cast and those glowing-coal-black eyes   
and the mighty dome of his forehead (to be sure,   
no Christian temple), as unlike a living man
as any waxwork at Madame Tussaud’s:
he had a face more mocking than a domino—
I would as soon have thought of sitting down

to tea with Hamlet or Ahasuerus ...”
As if on cue, the poet’s high voice fades,
the lights on his tree go out. Yet we have seen   
enough and heard enough: the secret of losing   
listeners—did Browning never learn?—
is to tell them everything. We lose details.   
The Mahdi’s skull and Fannie’s coincide ...

The scene blurs and the sounds become no more   
than exaggerated silence. Stand with me
another moment till our presence is
sacrificed to transitions altogether.
Time will not console—at best it orders
into a kind of seasonable chaos.
Let me tell you, it will not take much

longer than a medical prescription—
give you ingredients, no cure ...   
Visitors to the palazzo used to speak
of the dangerous ménage—the menagerie!   
yet the Costa Rican python that cost Pen
(or Fannie) sixteen pounds was the first to go,   
untempted by the rats of Rezzonico;

Dryope followed Dryope underground,   
the girl carried off by a chill and buried   
at San Michele, the great daub interred   
in the cellars of the Metropolitan ...
“Dear dead women, with such hair, too,”   
we quote, and notice that hair is the first
of ourselves to decay before—last after—death.

In a year Robert Browning too was dead, immortal;   
in another, Fannie dropped her shawl and took   
the veil and vows of an Episcopalian nun;
and Pen? Oh, Pen went on painting, of course—
buono di cuore, in yellow chamois gloves,
obese, oblivious, dithering into debt
and an easy death. The sale of what we saw

or saw through in Venice realized, as they say,   
some thirty thousand pounds at Sotheby’s.   
I told you: first glance is last chance.
Darkness slides over the waters—oil sludge   
spreading under, till even Venice dies,
immortally immerded. Earth has no other way,   
our provisional earth, than to become

invisible in us and rise again.
Rezzonico ... Disraeli ... We realize our task.   
It is to print earth so deep in memory
that a meaning reaches the surface. Nothing but   
darkness abides, darkness demanding not   
illumination—not from the likes of us—
but only that we yield. And we yield.


   And here is John Ruskin writing a letter home...

1851: A Message to Denmark Hill

The writer is John Ruskin, on his wedding journey in Venice.

My dearest father, it is the year’s First Day,
      Yet so like the Last, in Venice, no one
            Could tell this birth from the lees.
                  I know it is some while
Since you received a word of mine: there has been   
      The shabbiest sort of interruption   
            To our exchanges (to mine
                  At least) in the shape
Of a fever—nights of those imaginings,   
      Strange but shameful too, of the Infinite   
            By way of bedcovers and
                  Boa constrictors,
With cold wedges of ice, as I thought, laid down   
      At the corners of the bed, making me   
            Slip to its coiling center
                  Where I could not breathe.   
You knew from my last, I think, I had again
      Gone to the Zoological Gardens
            And seen the great boa take
                  Rabbits, which gave me   
An idea or two, and a headache. Then
      I had too much wine that same night, & dreamed
            Of a walk with Nurse, to whom
                  I showed a lovely
Snake I promised her was an innocent one:
      It had a slender neck with a green ring
            Round it, and I made her feel
                  The scales. When she bade
Me feel them too, it turned to a fat thing, like   
      A leech, and adhered to my hand, so that   
            I could scarcely pull it off—
                  And I awakened
(So much, father, for my serpentine fancies)   
      To a vermillion dawn, fever fallen,
            And the sea horizon dark,
                  Sharp and blue, and far
Beyond it, faint with trebled distance, came on   
      The red vertical cliffs in a tremor
            Of light I could not see without   
                  Recalling Turner
Who had taught me so to see it, yet the whole   
      Subdued to one soft gray. And that morning   
            I had your letter, father,
                  Telling of the death
Of my earthly master. How much more I feel   
      This now (perhaps it is worth noting here   
            The appearance of my first
                  Gray hair, this morning)
—More than I thought I should: everything
      In the sun, in the sky so speaks of him,
            So mourns their Great Witness lost.
                  Today, the weather
Is wretched, cold and rainy, dark like England   
      At this season. I do begin to lose
            All faith in these provinces.
                  Even the people
Look to me ugly, except children from eight   
      To fourteen, who here as in Italy
            Anywhere are glorious:
                  So playful and bright
In expression, so beautiful in feature,
      So dark in eye and soft in hair—creatures   
            Quite unrivalled. At fifteen
                  They degenerate
Into malignant vagabonds, or sensual
      Lumps of lounging fat. And this latter-day
            Venice, father! where by night
                  The black gondolas
Are just traceable beside one, as if Cadmus
      Had sown the wrong teeth and grown dragons, not
            Men. The Grand Canal, this month,
                  Is all hung, from end
To end, with carpets and tapestries like a street
      Of old-clothes warehouses. And now there is
            Even talk of taking down,
                  Soon, Tintoretto’s   
Paradise to “restore” it. Father, without
      The Turner Gallery, I do believe
            I should go today and live
                  In a cave on some
Cliffside—among crows. Oh what fools they are, this
      Restoring pack, yet smoothing all manner
            Of rottenness up with words.   
                  My Turner would not
Phrase like these, and only once in all the years
      I knew him said, “Thank you, Mr. Ruskin.”
            My own power, if it be that,   
                  Would be lost by mere
Fine Writing. You know I promised no Romance—
      I promised them Stones. Not even bread.
            Father, I do not feel any
                  Romance in Venice!   
Here is no “abiding city,” here is but
      A heap of ruins trodden underfoot
            By such men as Ezekiel
                  Angrily describes,
Here are lonely and stagnant canals, bordered
      For the most part by blank walls of gardens
            (Now waste ground) or by patches
                  Of mud, with decayed   
Black gondolas lying keel-upmost, sinking
      Gradually into the putrid soil.
            To give Turner’s joy of this
                  Place would not take ten
Days of study, father, or of residence:
      It is more than joy that must be the great   
            Fact I would teach. I am not sure,   
                  Even, that joy is
A fact. I am certain only of the strong   
      Instinct in me (I cannot reason this)   
            To draw, delimit the things
                  I love—oh not for
Reputation or the good of others or
      My own advantage, but a sort of need,
            Like that for water and food.
                  I should like to draw
All Saint Mark’s, stone by stone, and all this city,   
      Oppressive and choked with slime as it is   
            (Effie of course declares, each
                  Day, that we must leave:
A woman cannot help having no heart, but   
      That is hardly a reason she should have   
            No manners), yes, to eat it
                  All into my mind—
Touch by touch. I have been reading Paradise
      Regained lately, father. It seems to me   
            A parallel to Turner’s
                  Last pictures—the mind
Failing altogether, yet with intervals
      And such returns of power! “Thereupon   
            Satan, bowing low his gray   
                  Dissimulation,
Disappeared.” Now he is gone, my dark angel,
      And I never had such a conception
            Of the way I must mourn—not
                  What I lose, now, but
What I have lost, until now. Yet there is more   
      Pain knowing that I must forget it all,   
            That in a year I shall have
                  No more awareness
Of his loss than of that fair landscape I saw,   
      Waking, the morning your letter arrived,
            No more left about me than
                  A fading pigment.
All the present glory, like the present pain,
      Is no use to me; it hurts me rather
            From my fear of leaving it,
                  Of losing it, yet
I know that were I to stay here, it would soon
      Cease being glory to me—that it has
            Ceased, already, to produce
                  The impression and
The delight. I can bear only the first days   
      At a place, when all the dread of losing   
            Is lost in the delirium
                  Of its possession.
I daresay love is very well when it does not   
      Mean leaving behind, as it does always,
            Somehow, with me. I have not
                  The heart for more now,
Father, though I thank you and Mother for all   
      The comfort of your words. They bring me,
            With his loss, to what I said
                  Once, the lines on this
Place you will know: “The shore lies naked under   
      The night, pathless, comfortless and infirm
            In dark languor, still except
                  Where salt runlets plash
Into tideless pools, or seabirds flit from their   
      Margins with a questioning cry.” The light
            Is gone from the waters with
                  My fallen angel,
Gone now as all must go. Your loving son,
                                                 JOHN


(And here –  nothing to do with Howard's poem – is John Ruskin again, in a letter to Charles Eliot Norton, revealing an unexpected taste for... penguins! 
'
When I begin to think at all I get into states of disgust and fury at the way the mob is going on (meaning by mob, chiefly Dukes, crown princes, and such like persons) that I choke; and have to go to the British Museum and look at Penguins till I get cool. I find Penguins at present the only comfort in life. One feels everything in the world so sympathetically ridiculous; one can’t be angry when one looks at a Penguin.'
If only the London zoo had had living penguins and a penguin pool in Ruskin's day, the great sage might have been spared a deal of mental anguish.)
   Another, even longer Richard Howard poem, 'Wildflowers', imagines Walt Whitman receiving a visit from Oscar Wilde. It's very long, but a great read.