Monday 31 July 2023

Every Story Matters?

 The monstrous waste of time and money that calls itself The Covid-19 Inquiry is telling us, in a big publicity campaign, that 'Every Story Matters'. Now is our chance to tell them all about our experiences of living under the Covid terror. Well, I don't suppose mine is the kind of story they want to hear: decided early on against the mRNA 'vaccines', lived as near normally as possible, observing the restrictions minimally or not at all, looked on in horror as our basic freedoms were confiscated, came through unscathed (if I had Covid at any point, it was so mild I didn't notice – unlike all my fully vaccinated friends and relations). However, I decided to register my experiences with the Inquiry, if only to represent the control group in the great experiment that was performed on us all in the Covid years. The questionnaire is quite easy to navigate and gives enough space and options for the inquiry to glean some real information (if that is actually the aim), but the best thing about it is that it asks what lessons should be learned from the authorities' handling of the pandemic. Lessons, eh? I went for something like this: that lockdowns are hugely counter-productive in every way and should never be tried again, that vaccines should be fully tested and proven to be effective, that there should be mandatory reporting of all ill effects thereof and drug companies should never be granted legal immunity, that our civil liberties should never be suspended again on such an unprecedented scale, that there should be no censorship of scientific opinions that happen to oppose The Narrative, that schools in particular should never have been closed... That sort of thing. I can't be the only one to have reached similar conclusions – can I?

9 comments:

  1. Bravo. The collapse of reason was appalling and was perniciously maintained. Almost everything now feels like a parody of itself.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with much of what you say, Nige, but, with respect, you are wrong about vaccines. The regulators, MHRA and others, ensured that they were fully tested, the usual process being accelerated. Their side effects were dwarfed by the after effects of COVID 19. Ask any Long COVID sufferer or relatives of the dead. Vaccines are estimated to have prevented almost 20 million COVID deaths worldwide in their first year of use. (The Lancet, June 2022)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well yes, Rose, but can you really 'accelerate' vaccine testing? Surely there needs to be a real-time element – which is why vaccines usually take 8-10 years to test (after which most of them are rejected). Modified RNA was a novel therapy, whose track record in disease prevention was poor. It was authorised on what was essentially an experimental basis, but without the usual precautions, and with the drug companies indemnified against damage claims. It will be years before we get the full picture, but we are certainly now living with excess mortality rates higher than at almost any stage of the pandemic, and it is clear that there is no firm correlation between vaccination rates and outcomes (those parts of the world with low vaccination rates have come out of all this surprisingly well). In our country, first doses of the vaccine do seem to have had some beneficial effect, but after that the picture became much muddier, with risks probably outweighing benefits for most of the population.

      Delete
    2. It's a great shame that so many intelligent people have been duped into believing that the "vaccines" were properly tested and are "safe and effective". Because, despite government stonewalling, it is well established now that what little, brief, period of testing there was (and there is no way to shorten the standard period of years in which long term effects must be monitored to establish safety), yielded worrying results (which Pfizer attempted to bury for 75 years). And many real experts, with no vested interests to declare, risking reputation, sometimes medical registration, and financial losses (so totally trustworthy) are now standing up courageously to tell the truth that it is now very clear from the data that these unlicensed, experimental, substances, which should never have been released, are neither effective nor, more importantly, safe. Check out for example the utterly honourable Dr John Campbell, and highly respected cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, both of whom promoted the injection campaign (the latter as a tv doctor), but have totally changed their minds in the light of utterly damning evidence. Here is one of Campbell's videos on myocarditis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cd_RTf_ForA&t=161s), here's another https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZAso_eLJLI&t=624s, and here's an interview by Dr Tess Lawrie with eminent oncologist, Professor Angus Dalgleish FRCP FRCPath FMedSci., of St George's Hospital, University of London, and ground-breaking medical researcher - the video contains deperately worrying information about the effects of the injections in re cancer. It also talks about the obstacles to getting safe medications funded and and licensed medications repurposed. There are many other videos, including from Dr Campbell, reporting on the many fatal blood clots resulting from the injections. One claimed the life of a friend of our daughter's - she died 48 hours after the injection, leaving a husband and two little boys, and a coroner confirmed the cause. It's an outrage that this unparalleled mass medical experiment has not had the required monitoring, recording and analysis of all effects, with compulsory reporting of all deaths and adverse effects - as it is, it appears that only a minute fraction of these events have been collected under the voluntary Yellow Card Scheme, and it is unclear what, if anything, is being done with those reports. Since the advent of the injection programme there has been a very significant and sustained rise in excess deaths which shoulld be but isn't being investigated. There was only very briefly a period of significant excess death in the pre-"vax" Covid peiod (when the virus first hit and many old people died, as they always do in the respiratory disease season), and that rise exactly mirrored the size of the drop the previous year from the normal mortality level, because that was a "soft" flu year, leaving alive many very old and poorly people who would have died in a normal year, and therefore died the following year.
      The very eminent Professor Norman Fenton, expert statistitian and risk analyst, has produced excellent detailed analyses of the data on the safety and effectiveness of the injections, and demonstrated that they are neither. Check out his videos. He has also exploded the nonsensical predictions regarding the likely death toll from Covid, and condemned their use in producing ridiculous, fictional, calculations of lives saved by the injections. And the figures for recorded deaths from Covid are vastly inflated by the long period in which deaths of all who tested positive in hospital were recorded as Covid deaths whatever they were actually admitted for and died of, including car crash victims etc.. This, as many have said, is the greatest medical disaster of modern history.

      Delete
  3. You are not alone. I agree with every word. Karen Eade

    ReplyDelete
  4. With respect Your Nigeness you did have one characteristic Covid symptom when I had Covid - taste and olfactory disturbance. So it seems very likely that you did have Covid, and got through it in the normal way by means of your immune system, like me, and vast numbers of other "unvaxed". RE your comments re lessons to take away from the Covid (response) debacle - bravo indeed - but "vaccines should be fully tested and proven to be effective" and most importantly SAFE before ever being released to the public. The "Covid "vaccine" scandal is the greatest public health wrongdoing in modern history. Mrs Nige xxxx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well yes, Mrs N, but surely an isolated symptom hardly counts as 'having' Covid, and it might well have been a result of the chronic catarrh I was suffering from at the time. I wasn't sure then, and I'm still not.

      Delete
    2. Yes it does - having Covid simply means being infected with Covid (and your body therefore being engaged in fighting the infection). PCR tests picked up many cases of infection (though missed many too), many completely asymptomatic (as, before Covid, most people understood was routinely the case with many infections which transmitted through populations). Virtually everyone in a high transmission situation with lots of symtomatic cases with have been exposed to and contracted it, but many won't have noticed, or barely noticed, because their immune system dealt with it really effectively (often while it was still in the nose). The certain way to check if you've had it is an antibody test, but those are hard to get, and why bother when you know that it's (been) all around, travelling round among everybody? As I recall, your taste and olfactory disturbance was quite distinctive in it nature and since it occurred when I had Covid, very symptomatically, and with us living together in very close contact, it seems vanishinly unlikely to me that you didn't have Covid, but without an antibody test we could never be certain. xxxx

      Delete
  5. This correspondence must cease – Ed.

    ReplyDelete